Posted by Saddletank on 08.02.2013, 09:30 PM: I still stick with Arren's original plan which was everyone reviews what they like and he adds it to the first post. Its simple and can hardly go wrong.
|
Posted by Roarkiller on 08.02.2013, 10:56 PM: Pretty sure KareKano isn't a 1998 release tho, cuz I know even cardcaptor sakura is from 2000.
|
Posted by saviour2012 on 08.03.2013, 03:24 AM: I like saddle's template
|
Posted by arren18 on 08.03.2013, 04:30 AM: The two threads idea might be good, if one post can't fit everything, but as I said, I'm not sure what the limit is... Roar?
|
Posted by saviour2012 on 08.03.2013, 05:27 AM: a post can have maximum 12345 characters
|
Posted by Saddletank on 08.03.2013, 06:10 AM:
|
Posted by saviour2012 on 08.03.2013, 06:38 AM:
|
Posted by arren18 on 08.03.2013, 07:36 AM: I'm not sure just having a list to a discussion thread is very helpful, as it doesn't give a convenient short block of information in the same way. If having more detail does mean there is a problem with maybe reaching the post length limit, then we can, as discussed, make a separate thread for the real list, where we can add extra posts if necessary.
|
Posted by saviour2012 on 08.03.2013, 08:12 AM:
|
Posted by arren18 on 08.03.2013, 04:56 PM: The thing is, that's not much use if it's something that doesn't already have a thread, and then we might be making many threads that are just for that one purpose. We'd also have to go and adjust existing ones.
|
Posted by saviour2012 on 08.04.2013, 06:09 AM:
|
Posted by Saddletank on 08.04.2013, 07:44 AM:
|
Posted by saviour2012 on 08.04.2013, 08:14 AM:
|
Posted by arren18 on 08.04.2013, 09:16 AM: I don't think we would be wanting full-length reviews. Saddles's example review was mainly a summary with a little bit of personal opinion included. One of those for each item on the list wouldn't take up much space, and I imagine that there wouldn't be many things getting multiple reviews unless people have some disagreement about it. After all, if one person recommends a series or film and writes something positive about it, how many of the other recommenders are going to have such a wildly different view of it that they feel more reviews are needed?
|
Posted by Saddletank on 08.04.2013, 01:14 PM: I don't intend to write IMDB style reviews - and I don't think very many people here have the time or inclination to do so either. I don't think the people coming to the Tavern want to plough through huge walls of text so I think we should discourage long reviews. 350 words should be enough. That should get you 20 reviews to a post (I forget what the post length limit is on this form, I know I hit it once or twice when playing in the RPG but I know its several thousand words). What I did above would be all you can expect from me. Most of the actual useful info is in the one or two words notes beside the headings. To me that keeps the really essential info locked against bold headings where a skim-read by someone will see it more easily.
|
Posted by San Toelle Ul Shichikokuyama-g on 08.04.2013, 01:27 PM: Or, you know, ctrl+f... |
Posted by saviour2012 on 08.04.2013, 01:53 PM:
|
Posted by Saddletank on 08.04.2013, 03:59 PM: Saviour, I said WORDS, not characters. My review was 305 WORDS according to Bill Gates.
|
Posted by saviour2012 on 08.04.2013, 05:49 PM:
|
Posted by arren18 on 08.05.2013, 05:29 AM: Guys.
|
Powered by: Burning Board 1.2 2001-2002 by WoltLab GbR